Rosenblum Cellars Contra Costa County Zinfandel 2010

Compare prices & find Rosenblum Cellars Contra Costa County Zinfandel 2010 on Wine-Searcher

Rosenblum Cellars Contra Costa County Zinfandel 2010

Rosenblum Cellars · Contra Costa County, California, USA

At a glance

Producer
Rosenblum Cellars
Region
Contra Costa County, California, USA
Grape variety
Zinfandel
Wine type
Red
Body
Full-bodied and Smooth
Sweetness
Dry
Typical price
$18-30 USD

Tasting profile

Jammy blackberry, raspberry, and plum with notes of pepper, licorice, and hints of leather and dried herbs. Tertiary (aged) nuances emerging.

Evolution: Fruit character fading; structure increasingly dominated by earth, spice, and leathery notes.

At peak: Peak was likely 2015-2017, showing vivid fruit, spice, and classic Zinfandel lushness.

Structure

Acidity
Medium
Tannins
Medium, now integrating and softening
Alcohol
Moderate-High (typically 14-15%)
Aging potential
Short-Medium term; best within 5-8 years of vintage

Drinking window

Peak drinking
2014 to 2017
Optimal window
2013 to 2018
Current status
Ending optimal drinking window; drink soon.
Current condition
Mature; may show tertiary notes. Monitor for fading fruit.

Zinfandel from Contra Costa County is typically approachable young with bold fruit and spice. By 2024, most 2010 bottlings are past their best but can offer enjoyable mature flavors for enthusiasts. Immediate consumption is advised.

Food pairing

Barbecued meats, spicy sausages, slow-cooked lamb, hard cheeses.

Serving

Decant
Yes (30 minutes) — The wine is 15 years old with medium tannins that are integrating and softening, which suggests it can benefit from aeration to enhance its aromas and flavors.

Sustainability

Sustainability score: 4/10

Producer is mid-sized, with traditional viticulture and no publicized advanced renewable energy or water conservation programs in 2010. Standard glass packaging; no lightweight or recycled bottles reported.

Rosenblum Cellars in 2010 did not emphasize sustainability commitments. No environmental certifications, standard vineyard and cellar practices, and conventional packaging keep the overall sustainability score below average. Improvements may have occurred since, but they are not relevant for the 2010 vintage.