Clos Pegase Chardonnay Mitsuko's Vineyard Hommage 2009
Clos Pegase · Carneros, Napa Valley, California, USA
At a glance
- Producer
- Clos Pegase
- Region
- Carneros, Napa Valley, California, USA
- Grape variety
- Chardonnay
- Wine type
- White
- Body
- Full-bodied and Smooth
- Sweetness
- Dry
- Typical price
- $28–$45 USD (auction and secondary retail)
Tasting profile
Mature aromas of baked apple, hazelnut, butterscotch, toasted brioche, and dried citrus. Softening acidity, modest fruit, honeyed finish.
Evolution: Developed from fresh apple, pear, lemon zest, vanilla, with time evolving toward nutty, caramelized, and earthy flavors.
At peak: At peak 2012–2015 with vibrant fruit, subtle oak integration, crisp minerality; now more tertiary with subdued brightness.
Structure
- Acidity
- Moderate (slightly softened with age)
- Tannins
- None (white wine, un-oaked to lightly oaked)
- Alcohol
- 13.5%-14.2% ABV typical
- Aging potential
- 10-12 years under optimal conditions; now late in lifecycle
Drinking window
- Peak drinking
- 2012 to 2015
- Optimal window
- 2011 to 2016
- Current status
- Late maturity / approaching end of prime
- Current condition
- Likely showing tertiary notes; remaining bottles should be consumed soon. Some advanced oxidation possible depending on storage.
Napa Carneros Chardonnay is best drunk within 5-8 years of vintage; 2009 is now well past peak, with tertiary aromas dominating and primary fruit receding.
Food pairing
Best with roasted poultry, lobster with butter, mushroom risotto, triple-cream cheeses. For advanced bottles, pair with richer, umami-driven dishes.
Serving
- Decant
- Not required
Sustainability
Sustainability score: 6/10
Clos Pegase uses integrated pest management, drip irrigation, soil monitoring, and energy-efficient lighting (many adopted post-2014). Mitsuko's Vineyard was transitioning toward more sustainable practices but was not fully certified in 2009.
For 2009, Clos Pegase was in transition to modern Napa sustainability ethos but had not yet implemented full certified programs. Sustainable elements were present but not comprehensive. Vineyard management avoided excess chemical use, but water/energy conservation measures and full carbon-reduction were not fully formalized until later years. Therefore, wine rates above average for the period but well below top benchmarks today.