Quinta de Sant'Ana Pinot Noir 2011
Quinta de Sant'Ana · Lisboa, Portugal
At a glance
- Producer
- Quinta de Sant'Ana
- Region
- Lisboa, Portugal
- Grape variety
- Pinot Noir
- Wine type
- Red
- Body
- Medium-bodied and Fruity
- Sweetness
- Dry
- Typical price
- €35-€50 (secondary market; scarce availability as of 2024)
Tasting profile
Earthy red cherry, dried rose petal, forest floor, faded spice; tertiary notes strong. Fruit subdued.
Evolution: Bright fruit and lively acidity in youth; earthy, game, and sous-bois with age; 2011 now tertiary dominant.
At peak: Peak was reached 2017-2020; now in graceful decline; very elegant in optimal storage.
Structure
- Acidity
- Medium-high, providing backbone; beginning to soften
- Tannins
- Very fine, resolved
- Alcohol
- Medium (approx. 13%)
- Aging potential
- Designed for early to mid-term aging (5-10 years); 2011 now delicate
Drinking window
- Peak drinking
- 2016 to 2030
- Optimal window
- 2014 to 2033
- Current status
- Mature, at or past peak; optimal window just ending
- Current condition
- Fully mature, developed tertiary notes; may be fading
Portuguese Pinot Noir typically peaks earlier than Burgundy; Quinta de Sant'Ana’s 2011 is delicate/pale now but can show faded elegance. 2011 vintage had good ripeness but these wines are not built for 15+ years, especially with lighter structure. Preserved bottles may surprise, but most should be enjoyed soon.
Food pairing
Poultry (duck, quail), mushroom risotto, roast pork, mild cow’s cheese, lentil stew.
Serving
- Decant
- Not required
Sustainability
Sustainability score: 7/10
Integrated pest management, manual harvest, substantial biodiversity, solar-powered estate buildings, rainwater capture for irrigation, recycled light glass for some bottlings.
Quinta de Sant'Ana demonstrates meaningful sustainability—progressive agriculture, renewable energy, and water use optimization. Not certified organic, but avoids chemical overuse. Small-volume, high-quality production has moderate carbon impact (especially regionally); export air/long sea shipping raises total footprint. Efforts in local economy, biodiversity, and reduced energy elevate score, but absence of formal organic/biodynamic status or lightweight bottle in 2011 limits maximal rating.