Greasy Fingers™ Big Bold Cabernet Sauvignon
Greasy Fingers™ Wines · South Eastern Australia
At a glance
- Producer
- Greasy Fingers™ Wines
- Region
- South Eastern Australia
- Grape variety
- Cabernet Sauvignon
- Wine type
- Red
- Body
- Full-bodied and Bold
- Sweetness
- Dry
- Typical price
- $10-$15 USD
Tasting profile
Bold blackberry, cassis, black cherry, mature tannins, hints of oak spice, smooth finish.
Evolution: In 2-3 years, intensity mellows, tannins soften, more savory and integrated notes emerge.
At peak: At peak, expect ripe dark fruit, harmonious oak, plush mouthfeel, soft finish.
Structure
- Acidity
- Medium, supports freshness
- Tannins
- Medium-plus, ripe and supple
- Alcohol
- Medium-high (typical for region, likely 14%-14.5%)
- Aging potential
- Medium (most enjoyable within 3-5 years)
Drinking window
- Peak drinking
- 2026 to 2028
- Optimal window
- 2025 to 2029
- Current status
- Youthful, ready for casual enjoyment but can develop,
- Current condition
- Vibrant fruit, prominent tannins and acidity, approachable after a short decant
This style focuses on bold primary fruit and early approachability; cellaring polishes tannins but does not significantly enhance complexity. Best enjoyed within five years of vintage.
Food pairing
Grilled beef, barbecued ribs, burgers, hard aged cheeses, rich pasta dishes.
Serving
- Decant
- Not required
Sustainability
Sustainability score: 4/10
Likely employs large-scale commercial viticulture. No official claims on energy, water, or packaging initiatives.
Greasy Fingers™ Big Bold Cabernet Sauvignon is a mainstream, value-driven brand produced at scale for international markets. Publicly available data shows no environmental certifications or specific sustainability initiatives. While Australian regulations enforce certain minimum standards, this wine is not distinguished for low-impact farming, alternative energy, eco packaging, or water management. Glass bottles and long supply chains increase carbon emissions, and no offsetting or reduction is claimed. Score reflects the brand’s lack of published sustainable practices relative to industry leaders.