At a glance

Producer

Viña Tarapacá

Region

Maipo Valley, Chile

Grape variety

Red Blend (typically Cabernet Sauvignon, Syrah, Merlot, Cabernet Franc, and Petit Verdot)

Wine type

Red

Body

Full-bodied and Smooth

Sweetness

Dry

Typical price

$30-$45 USD

Tasting profile

Dark berry fruit, dried plum, cedar, tobacco, baking spice, earth; tertiary notes of forest floor and leather emerging

Evolution: Lost youthful vibrancy, gained complexity and subtlety, integrated structure

At peak: Rich and harmonious, with balanced fruit, spice, and subtle oak; tertiary notes prominent

Structure

Acidity

Medium

Tannins

Medium, softened with age

Alcohol

14%-14.5%

Aging potential

Fully developed, best enjoyed now; some bottles may hold for another 1-2 years with proper storage

Drinking window

Peak drinking

2016 to 2020

Optimal window

2014 to 2022

Current status

Mature, at or just past peak

Current condition

Approaching full maturity, tertiary flavors developing, gentle structure

The 2010 vintage was structured and capable of aging; at 14 years, most bottles have reached and passed their peak, displaying tertiary complexity and softened textures typical of mature Maipo red blends.

Food pairing

Roast lamb, grilled beef, mushroom risotto, aged cheeses, hearty stews

Serving

Decant

Yes (30 minutes) — The wine has aged for 15 years, which has softened the tannins. Decanting will help to further open up the aromas and flavors, enhancing the drinking experience.

Sustainability

Sustainability score: 6/10

Producer implements energy and water efficiency measures, biodiversity corridors, vineyard water management, and modern recycling/packaging practices. Partial renewable energy use at estate level. Transitioned packaging to lighter bottles post-2010.

Viña Tarapacá is committed to Chilean sustainability guidelines and has made strides in water conservation, biodiversity, and improved energy practices. They were early adopters of the 'Certified Sustainable Wine' label in Chile, though the program is less stringent than global organic/biodynamic standards. The 2010 vintage benefited from some energy and water-saving practices but lacked the most advanced eco-packaging and renewable energy innovations only implemented at the estate after 2015. Carbon footprint is middling due to the bottle's export status and historic glass weight. No organic or biodynamic certification for this wine/vintage.