Sole Rosso Sangiovese Riserva
Sole Rosso · Toscana, Italy
At a glance
- Producer
- Sole Rosso
- Region
- Toscana, Italy
- Grape variety
- Sangiovese
- Wine type
- Red
- Body
- Medium-bodied and Earthy
- Sweetness
- Dry
- Typical price
- $13-18 USD
Tasting profile
Red cherry, wild strawberry, leather, fresh herbs, subtle spice, hint of tomato leaf and dried rose petals. Medium body and moderate grip.
Evolution: Over 2-4 years will develop more forest floor, tobacco and subtle balsamic notes. Fruit will mellow and earthiness rise.
At peak: From 2025-2028, expect melded fruit and earthy complexity, balanced tannins, and softened acidity.
Structure
- Acidity
- Lively, classic for Sangiovese
- Tannins
- Medium-firm, moderately grippy but integrated
- Alcohol
- 14.0% ABV
- Aging potential
- Solid—enjoy over 5-7 years from vintage
Drinking window
- Peak drinking
- 2025 to 2028
- Optimal window
- 2024 to 2029
- Current status
- Youthful, primary fruit forward
- Current condition
- Structured and vibrant, will benefit from short cellaring but approachable now
Sangiovese Riserva from Tuscany is intended for early to mid-term aging; structure and acidity preserve freshness, but peak drinkability is often at 3-6 years post-vintage when fruit and tannin are both present and harmonized.
Food pairing
Classic with Tuscan cuisine, especially grilled meats, ragu pasta, aged Pecorino, mushroom risotto, or roasted vegetables with herbs.
Serving
- Serving temperature
- 16-18°C / 61-64°F
- Decant
- Yes (30-60 minutes) — Young Riserva benefits from aeration to soften tannins and release aromatic complexity.
Sustainability
Sustainability score: 6/10
Responsible vineyard management; some cover cropping and moderate spray reduction initiatives reported for the estate, but not fully organic. Energy use largely conventional but vineyards maintained with minimal water input (dry-farmed). Packaging is standard-weight glass with recyclable cork closure.
Producer employs some sustainable practices but is not certified organic, biodynamic, or 'sustainable'. Efforts like cover crops and drought resilience are positive, but heavier glass bottle, non-local consumption, and lack of energy/water transparency bring the score to just above average. Further improvements would include lighter bottles, formal certification, or carbon offset program.