Coevo 2006
Cecchi · Tuscany, Italy
At a glance
- Producer
- Cecchi
- Region
- Tuscany, Italy
- Grape variety
- Sangiovese, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Petit Verdot (Super Tuscan blend)
- Wine type
- Red
- Body
- Full-bodied and Smooth
- Sweetness
- Dry
- Typical price
- $70-$120 (USD, current secondary market range)
Tasting profile
Dried cherry, fig, leather, tobacco, cedar, earth. Tertiary notes prominent. Subtle fruit persists.
Evolution: Once fruit-forward and robust, now nuanced, more forest floor, balsamic and savory complexities.
At peak: Best structure and complexity likely between 2016-2020; now offers classic mature Super Tuscan elegance if well cellared.
Structure
- Acidity
- Medium-plus; sufficient for further life, but softening
- Tannins
- Resolved; supple and integrated
- Alcohol
- 14.0% ABV (Typical)
- Aging potential
- Limited; best to drink soon, may fade rapidly
Drinking window
- Peak drinking
- 2016 to 2020
- Optimal window
- 2014 to 2022
- Current status
- Near or just past peak; advanced maturity expected
- Current condition
- Mature; tertiary flavors dominate, risk of decline if not well-cellared
The 2006 Coevo Cecchi was constructed for long-term aging—stellar in its first decade, it has now developed full tertiary character. If perfectly stored, it delivers classic evolved Super Tuscan richness, but its window is closing, and risk of decline accelerates from this point onward.
Food pairing
Braised beef, aged Pecorino, porcini risotto, wild boar ragu, roasted game birds.
Serving
- Decant
- Not required
Sustainability
Sustainability score: 7/10
Cecchi has implemented sustainable vineyard management: reduced chemical inputs, water conservation initiatives, solar energy adoption, lightened bottle weight since 2010 (post-2006), eco-friendly packaging advances, ISO 14001 environmental management system.
Cecchi is among Tuscany’s recognized leaders in sustainability, having pioneered modern low-impact viticulture in the region. For the 2006 vintage, environmental standards were above average but not at today’s best-in-class: integrated pest management and early renewable energy use were pluses, but glass bottles were heavier than subsequent post-2010 vintages, and there were no formal organic/biodynamic certifications for this release. Export carbon costs apply outside Italy/EU. Overall, strong for its era, but not fully at the cutting edge.